![]() A 1978 report by the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works (“CONTU”) stated that “‘the eligibility of any work for protection by copyright depends. įederal agencies have taken a similar stance. ![]() Slater (2018), the same court held that a monkey could not register a copyright in photos that it took with a camera. Kristen Maaherra (1997), the Ninth Circuit held that a book supposedly authored by spiritual beings was not copyrightable. these systems are exposed to their surroundings, ‘blindfolded,’ and allowed to choose from the myriad self-generated fantasies it finds most interesting.” Īs the Review Board explained, courts “have repeatedly rejected attempts to extend copyright protection to non-human creations.” In Urantia Found. Thaler explains, “Rather than show a neural net pictures (as a big search engine company has) and allow it to replace items in the scene with weird objects deliberately planted by software engineers. “A Recent Entrance to Paradise” is part of a series of images simulating a near-death experience, in which the algorithm reprocesses pictures to create images and text passages representing a narrative about the afterlife. Rather, he identified the author as an artificial-intelligence algorithm called “Creativity Machine.” Thaler did not merely assert that the work was generated with the assistance of AI, but that it “‘was autonomously created by a computer algorithm running on a machine.’” ![]() Last month, the Review Board of the United States Copyright Office affirmed a 2019 refusal to register the two-dimensional artwork titled “A Recent Entrance to Paradise.” The initial application for registration was filed by Steven Thaler in 2018-but what makes the application particularly interesting is that Thaler did not list himself as the author of the work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |